Association of Historians of American Art

A scholarly community for the history of American art that has become the field's central gathering place, convening scholars and publishing an open access journal

26named by peers

Financial profile

Association of Historians of American Art · EIN 68-0547795 · 501(c)(3)

Fiscal yearTotal revenueContributionsProgram servicesTotal expensesNet assetsYear end
FY2023$18,137$37,321$75,341Dec 2023
FY2022$29,745$50,745$94,525Dec 2022

Figures exactly as reported. A blank cell was blank on the form. The fiscal year links to the filing.

Something wrong here? Tell us what we missed.

Peer societies

Five societies Association of Historians of American Art is read alongside.

Who backs AHAA

No public supporter list found as of September 2026.

Something wrong here? Tell us what we missed.

Who backs Association of Historians of American Art's peers, but not Association of Historians of American Art

Companies named publicly by at least one of Association of Historians of American Art's five peer societies, and not found in Association of Historians of American Art's reviewed public records.

Something wrong here? Tell us what we missed.

The outside view

A scholarly community for the history of American art that has become the field's central gathering place, convening scholars and publishing an open access journal

  • Consensus
  • Build
  • Inward
  • Volunteer

Their shape

The Guild

Where mastery is the price of belonging.

The Guild is the keeper of a craft and its standards, where belonging means meeting a real bar. Its gift is depth and trusted expertise, its challenge is opening up to newcomers and new ways.

Also reads toward The Village and The Republic.

Strengths

→Deep loyalty and a strong sense of belonging.
→Standards and credentials carry real weight.
→Expertise and trusted credential in the field.

Not an official page of Association of Historians of American Art. Sociogene does not consult. Everything here comes from public sources, dated and linked. Something wrong here? Tell us what we missed.