Association for Psychological Science

The leading society for scientific psychology, publisher of a stable of peer-reviewed journals and a national advocate for the standing and funding of the science

12named by APS
19named by peers

Financial profile

Association for Psychological Science · EIN 73-1345573 · 501(c)(3)

Fiscal yearTotal revenueContributionsProgram servicesTotal expensesNet assetsYear end
FY2023$6,458,969$1,342,803$4,680,707$6,613,983$9,756,281Dec 2023
FY2022$6,180,928$1,334,510$4,143,891$6,457,764$9,032,617Dec 2022
FY2021$7,237,080$2,661,043$3,739,093$6,374,079$11,214,088Dec 2021
FY2020$5,915,714$1,625,832$3,877,343$6,030,103$9,667,602Dec 2020
FY2019$8,256,064$1,931,309$5,775,423$7,743,074$9,096,107Dec 2019
FY2018$6,866,349$1,958,083$4,511,016$6,513,783$7,684,411Dec 2018

Figures exactly as reported. A blank cell was blank on the form. The fiscal year links to the filing.

Something wrong here? Tell us what we missed.

Peer societies

Five societies Association for Psychological Science is read alongside.

Who backs APS

Every company Association for Psychological Science names publicly as a supporter, exactly as published. Companies also named by other associations on Sociogene come first.

CompanySupport as publishedAlso named by
MDPIExhibitorACS AAR APHA ASV ASHG +3
Springer NatureExhibitorALAO ACS AAR AAPS ALA +3
Sage PublishingMeeting sponsorAAA ALA UAA
Prolific-Logo_BlueExhibitorAAPOR SPSP
Frontiers-Media-SAExhibitorAPHA
NoldusInformationTechnologyExhibitorGF
Sona SystemsExhibitorSPSP
BIOPACSystemsIncExhibitorOnly Association for Psychological Science, so far
iMotionsExhibitorOnly Association for Psychological Science, so far
millisecondExhibitorOnly Association for Psychological Science, so far
Open Science ToolsExhibitorOnly Association for Psychological Science, so far
PosterSmithExhibitorOnly Association for Psychological Science, so far
Sources: 1 published list, read September 2026

2026 APS Annual Convention exhibitors and sponsors. Read September 27, 2026. Convention logo wall read from image alt text and file names; universities, nonprofits, a government agency, Cambridge University Press and JASP (university projects) left out.

Something wrong here? Tell us what we missed.

Who backs Association for Psychological Science's peers, but not Association for Psychological Science

Companies named publicly by at least one of Association for Psychological Science's five peer societies, and not found in Association for Psychological Science's reviewed public records.

CompanyAPASPSPIAAPPeers
SageTier 4Supporting Sponsors2 of 3
AlmaTier 31 of 3
American Professional Agency, Inc.Tier 11 of 3
Big HealthNamed1 of 3
bl (bloomsbury.com)EXHIBITORS1 of 3
CloudResearchplatinum sponsor1 of 3
Factor 110Supporting Sponsors1 of 3
Flutter_SouthernEuropeAfrica_Logo (sisal.it)SPONSOR1 of 3
frontiers-vector-logo (frontiersin.org)EXHIBITORS1 of 3
giunti.png (giuntipsy.it)MAIN SPONSOR1 of 3
hogrefe-logo (hogrefe.com)MAIN SPONSOR1 of 3
Insight TimerNamed1 of 3
Logo-Pesi (formazionecontinuainpsicologia.it)EXHIBITORS1 of 3
OpenAITier 11 of 3
SimplePracticeNamed1 of 3
TheraNestTier 11 of 3
TherapySitesNamed1 of 3
YouTubeNamed1 of 3
ZandaNamed1 of 3

Something wrong here? Tell us what we missed.

The outside view

The leading society for scientific psychology, publisher of a stable of peer-reviewed journals and a national advocate for the standing and funding of the science

  • Consensus
  • Build
  • Inward
  • Operational

Their shape

The Republic

Run by its members, built to outlast them.

The Republic runs like a well-built institution, professional and stable, under the guidance of its members. Its gift is scale and continuity, its challenge is staying close to the grassroots as it grows.

Also reads toward The Guild and The Frontier.

Strengths

→Member voice and public mission stay in healthy balance.
→Open to reform without losing its footing.
→Speaks credibly on behalf of a whole field.

Not an official page of Association for Psychological Science. Sociogene does not consult. Everything here comes from public sources, dated and linked. Something wrong here? Tell us what we missed.